AG Opinions

Attorney General
Opinions

Consumer Complaints

File a
Complaint

Training Icon

Events and
Training

Request a Speaker Icon

Request a
Speaker

Robocall Icon

Robocall
Reporting Form

Common Senior Scams

Common Senior
Scams

Lemon Icon

Lemon
Laws

Information

Press
Releases

AG Opinions

Attorney General
Opinions

Consumer Complaints

File a
Complaint

Training Icon

Events and
Training

Request a Speaker Icon

Request a
Speaker

Robocall Icon

Robocall
Reporting Form

Common Senior Scams

Common Senior
Scams

Lemon Icon

Lemon
Laws

Information

Press
Releases

Latest from

X white large logo

Press Releases

Thursday, May 21, 2026

Attorney General Griffin Announces $5.5 Million Settlement with Family Dollar over Rat Infestation

Read More >

Monday, May 11, 2026

More Than 400 Register for Attorney General Griffin’s Emerging Issues Series Event Exploring AI and the Law

Read More >

AG Seal

Friday, May 08, 2026

Attorney General Griffin Continues Fight against Shipment of Abortion Pills into Arkansas, Joins Amici Briefs Challenging FDA Rule

Read More >

Attorney General Opinions

2026-052
Ms. Rachael Kear
2026-05-27

Question: Is the custodian's decision to release the requested records with redactions consistent with the Arkansas Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)?

Brief Response: The custodian’s decision is partially consistent with the FOIA. The custodian must review the facts surrounding the three complaints discussed in the opinion, determine whether they are unsolicited or solicited, and then apply the appropriate test for release. If a complaint is unsolicited, it constitutes a personnel record and may be released under the applicable balancing test. In the case of the “Kear Complaint,” if it is determined to be a personnel record, the custodian must redact any information concerning the nature, treatment, or diagnosis of an employee’s medical condition before releasing the record. Finally, the basis for some of the redactions is unclear, and additional exempt information appears in the records unredacted. The custodian must carefully review all records slated for release—whether documents or video recordings—to ensure that social security numbers and driver’s license numbers are properly redacted before disclosure.

https://opinionstorage.blob.core.windows.net/opinions/2026-052.pdf?sv=2024-11-04&spr=https&st=2025-11-10T16%3A56%3A20Z&se=2033-01-02T01%3A11%3A20Z&sr=c&sp=racwdl&sig=f4DaaI85zQD1LrafTHkslBvUPZhTHLXbHbLjhM45yLg%3D
2026-048
Ms. Brittany Byrd
2026-05-26

Question: Is the custodian's decision to release the requested records consistent with the Arkansas Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)?

Brief Response: To the extent the custodian intends to release all of the requested personnel and evaluation records without any redactions, that decision is inconsistent with the FOIA. The custodian must review the responsive records, properly classify them, apply the appropriate tests for disclosure, and make any required redactions before releasing the records.

https://opinionstorage.blob.core.windows.net/opinions/2026-048.pdf?sv=2024-11-04&spr=https&st=2025-11-10T16%3A56%3A20Z&se=2033-01-02T01%3A11%3A20Z&sr=c&sp=racwdl&sig=f4DaaI85zQD1LrafTHkslBvUPZhTHLXbHbLjhM45yLg%3D
2026-045
Mr. Brandon Henry
2026-05-18

Question: Is the custodian’s decision to release the requested record with redactions consistent with the Arkansas Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)?

Brief Response: In my opinion, the custodian has correctly classified the disciplinary action form as an employee-evaluation record. And because the four-part test for release of employee-evaluation records appears to be met, the custodian’s decision to release the record is also consistent with the FOIA.

https://opinionstorage.blob.core.windows.net/opinions/2026-045.pdf?sv=2024-11-04&spr=https&st=2025-11-10T16%3A56%3A20Z&se=2033-01-02T01%3A11%3A20Z&sr=c&sp=racwdl&sig=f4DaaI85zQD1LrafTHkslBvUPZhTHLXbHbLjhM45yLg%3D

Our Divisions

Civil

Civil
Litigation