Latest from

X white large logo

Attorney General Opinions

2026-053
Ms. Sherita Washington
2026-05-28

Question: Is the custodian's decision to release the requested records with redactions consistent with the Arkansas Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)?

Brief Response: In my opinion, the custodian has correctly classified these records as personnel records that are subject to release. And the custodian has also properly redacted the employeeโ€™s personal contact information, Social Security number, date of birth, personnel number, and information related to marital status and dependents.

https://opinionstorage.blob.core.windows.net/opinions/2026-053.pdf?sv=2024-11-04&spr=https&st=2025-11-10T16%3A56%3A20Z&se=2033-01-02T01%3A11%3A20Z&sr=c&sp=racwdl&sig=f4DaaI85zQD1LrafTHkslBvUPZhTHLXbHbLjhM45yLg%3D
2026-052
Ms. Rachael Kear
2026-05-27

Question: Is the custodian's decision to release the requested records with redactions consistent with the Arkansas Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)?

Brief Response: The custodianโ€™s decision is partially consistent with the FOIA. The custodian must review the facts surrounding the three complaints discussed in the opinion, determine whether they are unsolicited or solicited, and then apply the appropriate test for release. If a complaint is unsolicited, it constitutes a personnel record and may be released under the applicable balancing test. In the case of the โ€œKear Complaint,โ€ if it is determined to be a personnel record, the custodian must redact any information concerning the nature, treatment, or diagnosis of an employeeโ€™s medical condition before releasing the record. Finally, the basis for some of the redactions is unclear, and additional exempt information appears in the records unredacted. The custodian must carefully review all records slated for releaseโ€”whether documents or video recordingsโ€”to ensure that social security numbers and driverโ€™s license numbers are properly redacted before disclosure.

https://opinionstorage.blob.core.windows.net/opinions/2026-052.pdf?sv=2024-11-04&spr=https&st=2025-11-10T16%3A56%3A20Z&se=2033-01-02T01%3A11%3A20Z&sr=c&sp=racwdl&sig=f4DaaI85zQD1LrafTHkslBvUPZhTHLXbHbLjhM45yLg%3D
2026-050
Mr. Russ Racop
2026-05-27

Question: Is the custodian's decision to withhold the termination letter and investigative file consistent with the Arkansas Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)?

Brief Response: Because I have not reviewed the records at issue, I cannot definitively state whether the custodian has correctly classified them as employee-evaluation records. Additionally, I do not have sufficient information to determine whether the employeeโ€™s termination has reached administrative finality. However, if the records are employee-evaluation records and the termination is not yet administratively final, then the custodianโ€™s decision to withhold the records is consistent with the FOIA.

https://opinionstorage.blob.core.windows.net/opinions/2026-050.pdf?sv=2024-11-04&spr=https&st=2025-11-10T16%3A56%3A20Z&se=2033-01-02T01%3A11%3A20Z&sr=c&sp=racwdl&sig=f4DaaI85zQD1LrafTHkslBvUPZhTHLXbHbLjhM45yLg%3D